[81876] in Cypherpunks
Re: Declan as a Budding Washington Insider
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Declan McCullagh)
Mon Jun 16 00:45:36 1997
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 23:53:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <v03102801afca23e96bf3@[207.167.93.63]>
Reply-To: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
Tim is right to raise these points. In fact I've talked about "DC
insiderism" with him and here on the list in the past.
But Tim's conclusions are way off-target. Just because you have access to
information doesn't mean you've been co-opted. For instance, contrary to
what Tim says, I've never "promised to spin the story in a certain way."
That's the job of a PR flack, not a journalist. Also, contrary to what Tim
says, I've never been "sworn to secrecy." Rather, some discussions are
off-the-record, which is fairly common practice even if you're covering
City Hall in Topeka. Doesn't mean I can't use the information -- as I said
in the paragraph Tim elided, I do -- just that I can't quote a particular
person.
Tim writes: But you're sure showing all the signs of becoming just another
Washington Insider."
In truth I'm doing what a reporter should do: talk to lots of folks who
are involved in a particular issue. If this makes me an "insider," I'll
cop to that. But if I didn't meet and chat with thse folks, I wouldn't be
doing my job.
I mean, geez, if nothing else, look at what I've been writing. Last
Thursday I wrote about how the Federal government should get out of the
business of "protecting privacy." On Friday I wrote about how "protecting
children" from animated cartoon images is another pretext for
Net-censorship. Who else is saying that?
If anything, I've becoming more cynical as I spend more time on this beat.
-Declan
