[81362] in Cypherpunks
Re: Responses to "Spam costs and questions" (long)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Declan McCullagh)
Fri Jun 6 23:49:13 1997
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 1997 22:38:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
To: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <P4gw8D26w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply-To: Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
So we do agree after all!
-Declan
(Who thinks that no consensual speech should be banned by the government.
I can, however, see a common law argument for spam as trespass after
repeated cease-and-desist notes are sent.)
On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com> writes:
> > I suspect we agree on spam.)
>
> I kind of doubt it.
>
> Do you believe, as I do, that "spam" deserves the protection as any other kind
> of speech, and that so libel, child pornography, and bolb-making instructions?
>
> I didn't think so. :-)
>
> ---
>
> <a href="mailto:dlv@bwalk.dm.com">Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM</a>
> Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps
>
>
