[80009] in Cypherpunks
Re: RSA, PGP IN LEGAL FLAP OVER ENCRYPTION TECHNOLOGY
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kent Crispin)
Tue May 13 23:46:29 1997
Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 19:47:47 -0700
From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
To: "cypherpunks@toad.com" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Reply-To: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
On Tue, May 13, 1997 at 07:11:48PM -0800, Jim Bell wrote:
> At 12:45 5/12/97 -0700, Chris DiBona wrote:
>
> >And keep in mind , I don't begrudge RSA thier right to make money off thier
> intellectual property,
>
> However, I've been waiting many years for some patent-law-knowledgeable
> person to explain why mathematics, which was widely seen as being absolutely
> unpatentable prior to the invention of public-key cryptography, suddenly
> became patentable just in time for RSA, etc.
>
> Until I hear such an explanation, I _DO_ begrudge RSA and others that "right."
Wow! I agree with you!
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html
