[79876] in Cypherpunks
Re: War & InfoWar
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (frissell@panix.com)
Tue May 13 01:16:25 1997
From: frissell@panix.com
Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 06:56:07 -0400
To: Blanc <blancw@cnw.com>, cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970510224212.006e0a84@cnw.com>
Reply-To: frissell@panix.com
At 10:43 PM 5/10/97 -0700, Blanc wrote:
>TruthMonger wrote:
>
>> Of course, you have your own definintion of innocenent bystanders,
>>while others may have different definitions.
>..........................................................
>
>To me, an innocent bystander would be someone who was walking by a building
>which was blown up by someone with a grudge against its occupants.
>
>You lose the point of your attack when you kill those who do not relate to
>the reason for your attack.
>
>"To save the village, we had to destroy it."
>
>
> ..
>Blanc
>
But Blanc,what if "It Takes A Village to Raise a Child" and the village is trying to raise my child against my will. In that case, the only way to handle things is to destroy the village. Not to save it,but to save my child.
Think about it.
But not for too long.
DCF
