[79482] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: SAFE Bill discussion

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Frantz)
Sat May 3 03:52:32 1997

In-Reply-To: <199705020752.IAA00794@server.test.net>
Date: Sat, 3 May 1997 00:14:00 -0700
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Reply-To: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>

There may be something in the view that there are enough laws already on
the books that if government agents want to give you grief, they can find a
way.  Adding another one is minor compared with preventing crypto
restrictions via executive order.  (How many laws did you break today?
Since I drove a car, I broke at least one.  With respect for the law gone,
the law has only fear, and that's a function of enforcement, and subject to
economic realities.)  YMMV.

Of course, getting rid of these kinds of laws is a project which is long
overdue starting and not adding new ones would be a good start.  (But
that's another rant.)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | God could make the world   | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506     | in six days because he did | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | not have an installed base.| Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post