[53210] in Cypherpunks
Re: CDA Court Challenge: Update #3
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thomas J. Sawyer)
Wed Apr 3 21:34:58 1996
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 1996 21:04:42 -0500 (EST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
From: sawyer@nextek.com (Thomas J. Sawyer)
> * The DoJ is trying to draw a distinction between "indecent" images
> of couples engaged in sexual intercourse and educational
> "indecent" material that they will claim is not going to be
> prosecuted under the CDA.
I wonder if they are considering any "artistic" indecent material that
would also not be prosecuted?
Maybe if Playboy remains themselves to "A Pictorial of The Female Body"
then it would be ok.
Just a thought anyway.
Thanks for reading,
Thomas J. Sawyer
sawyer@nextek.com
