| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 13:34:08 -0500 (EST) From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li> To: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU> Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com, jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com> In-Reply-To: <olLK_qC00YUvE6poEO@andrew.cmu.edu> On Sat, 30 Mar 1996, Declan B. McCullagh wrote: > * Why would Jim Bell post anonymously? He writes: > > > That is a silly conclusion. The primary reason for anonymity with such > > postings is to avoid controversy being associated with one's name. I, as > > No, the primary reason for anonymity is to avoid being *associated* with > one's name. I know this may be attributing an undeserved sense of > precedence, but perhaps Jim Bell has realized that his opinions are > discarded out-of-hand by many on this list, so he posts anonymously to > regain some credibility. A message from anonymous would also work nicely > to reinforce his own position, allowing Jim Bell to claim additional > allies. It is a measure of desperation when resorting to completely anonymous postings creates an >increase< in reputation capital. --- My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li "In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti 00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |