[52991] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: CDT Policy Post 2.12 - Sen. Burns Announces New Bill To

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (jamesd@echeque.com)
Sat Mar 30 13:23:10 1996

From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 10:05:18 -0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com

At 05:52 PM 3/28/96 -0500, Bob Palacios wrote:
> The Burns bill is different from the other proposals in several respects.
> Specifically, the latest bill does not contain any new criminal provisions
> or provisions imposing liability on third party key holders.

Wow!!!

Have I been excessively cynical?  Perhaps, but the argument "You should 
support the Leahy bill or they will hit you with something worse" did 
nothing for my paranoia.

Now I expect the NSA to do a little tour of the halls of congress telling
the Senators "If you knew what we knew -- we would have to kill you", but
let us applaude Burns anyway.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post