[52505] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: NT's C2 rating

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rick Smith)
Fri Mar 22 18:31:40 1996

Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 17:11:08 -0600
From: Rick Smith <smith@sctc.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Cc: smith@sctc.com

Regarding the comment:

>> Basically, I'm now questioning the C2 rating of Windows NT.  The 
>> entire security layer is  modular to the Kernel.  As a modular 
>> driver, it can be removed, rewritten, and replaced.   

C2 is no big deal. It means you have the typical security measures
that can be disabled or bypassed by a trojan horse. You're not doing
serious protection till you put in mandatory protections like what
appears in B or A level systems.

The big deal is that few vendors have tried to get NCSC evaluations.

Rick.
smith@sctc.com    secure computing corporation

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post