[52444] in Cypherpunks
Re: MS self-generated X.509 validity?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Young)
Thu Mar 21 18:17:21 1996
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 08:31:31 +1000 (EST)
From: Eric Young <eay@mincom.oz.au>
To: "David K. Merriman" <merriman@arn.net>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960320174659.00687e44@arn.net>
On Wed, 20 Mar 1996, David K. Merriman wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> I've just had a chance to go through the SDK MS is giving away for their
> ActiveX package. Interestingly, there's a little utility included for
> generating X.509 certs. The read.me that is included claims that the certs
> so generated don't have any real validity, as they're not linked to anything
> in the known universe (paraphrasing :-).
>
> My question is, is this an otherwise usable cert? I'll be happy to give
> anyone interested a copy of the files (shellback.cer and shellback.spc) I
> generated, if they'd like to examine/validate them.
Send them to me and I'll have a look and comment on them if you like.
I have a few tools for pulling apart X509/ASN.1 objects :-)
eric
--
Eric Young | Signature removed since it was generating
AARNet: eay@mincom.oz.au | more followups than the message contents :-)
