[52005] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [noise] Re: Do you feel lucky, punk?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Davis)
Tue Mar 12 03:16:53 1996

Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 03:04:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian Davis <bdavis@thepoint.net>
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Cc: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>, cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960311213348.11349A-100000@polaris.mindport.net>

On Mon, 11 Mar 1996, Black Unicorn wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Mar 1996, jim bell wrote:
> 
> > At 05:54 PM 3/11/96 -0500, Black Unicorn wrote:
> 
> 3> At least, that is the position the prosecutors could surely take, 
> especially given this Supreme Court decision.
> 
> Uh huh.  They might also take the position that the defendent is ugly, 
> and should be convicted.  That doesn't make it a legally viable argument.

No, we usually go for the more general "I don't like the defendant." 


EBD
Assassination Politics target #xxxx.


BTW if I ever start lecturing cryptgraphers incessantly over days with 
rantings about the technical aspects of cryptography, I hope one of you 
tells me to shut the fuck up.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post