[49616] in Cypherpunks
Re: violating politicians privacy
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (attila)
Fri Feb 9 04:52:00 1996
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 09:50:09 +0000 (GMT)
From: attila <attila@primenet.com>
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <199602090618.WAA24333@ix13.ix.netcom.com>
On Thu, 8 Feb 1996, Bill Stewart wrote:
> attila said:
>
> > well, I take it as assumed correct that illegally violating the
> > credit and personal information of member os Congress (might as well
> > include the Clintons and the Gores) would get a response on privacy.
>
> _Is_ it violating their privacy to get their credit information?
> After all, they're applying for some mighty big loans from everybody,
> and putting everybody who pays US taxes down as a credit reference....
>
attila writes:
well, remember, Congress has a prime function that their "duty"
is to legislate a bunch of laws for _us_ to live buy; and, that being
done, to legislate a second set of laws, more to their liking, for
_them_ to live by and collect $5M pensions, and 100% health coverage
at the very best for the rest of their lifes.
__________________________________________________________________________
go not unto usenet for advice, for the inhabitants thereof will say:
yes, and no, and maybe, and I don't know, and fuck-off.
_________________________________________________________________ attila__
To be a ruler of men, you need at least 12 inches....
There is no safety this side of the grave. Never was; never will be.
