[48697] in Cypherpunks
Re: Alleged RC2
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike McNally)
Tue Jan 30 13:50:13 1996
From: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 12:29:44 -0600
To: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Cc: bofur@alpha.c2.org, cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960130101401.8758B-100000@chivalry>
Any ideas on whether the comment in the source about the "effective
key length" trick being an export control deal is true?
If there were a known version of this floating around known to have a
40-bit restriction, is it likely that the restriction would be done by
always supplying "40" as the "bits" parameter, or would be it by
simply limiting the user key length?
______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tivoli Systems * Austin TX * I want more, I want more,
m5@tivoli.com * m101@io.com * I want more, I want more ...
<URL:http://www.io.com/~m101> *_______________________________
