[48266] in Cypherpunks
SMTP mail failed
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (postmaster@ncr-sd.SanDiegoCA.ATTGI)
Sat Jan 27 04:41:00 1996
From: postmaster@ncr-sd.SanDiegoCA.ATTGIS.COM
Date: Sat Jan 27 01:38:50 PST 1996
Apparently-To: <cypherpunks@toad.com>
---------- diagnosis ----------
SMTP diagnosis, WWIS Version 3.09 :
Not-Delivered-To: npg-sd.scrippsranchca.ncr.com!claborne@npg-sd.scrippsranchca.ncr.com
Due to: Expired Maximum Time.
--------- unsent mail ---------
Received: by ncr-sd.SanDiegoCA.ATTGIS.COM; 24 Jan 96 00:01:44 PST
Received: from ncrgw1.UUCP (ncrgw1@localhost) by ncrhub4.attgis.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with UUCP id CAA20271 for npg-sd.scrippsranchca.ncr.com!claborne; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 02:20:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: by ncrgw1.ATTGIS.COM; 24 Jan 96 02:20:14 EST
Received: from toad.com by relay3.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzzwe08693; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 02:09:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: by toad.com id AA14608; Tue, 23 Jan 96 23:07:36 PST
Received: from cs.umass.edu (freya.cs.umass.edu) by toad.com id AA14602; Tue, 23 Jan 96 23:07:30 PST
Received: from thor.cs.umass.edu by cs.umass.edu (5.65/Ultrix3.0-C)
id AA11514; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 02:07:27 -0500
Received: (from lmccarth@localhost) by thor.cs.umass.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) id CAA02492 for cypherpunks@toad.com; Wed, 24 Jan 1996 02:07:26 -0500
Message-Id: <199601240707.CAA02492@thor.cs.umass.edu>
Subject: Reporting ITAR Violations
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 02:07:26 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
In-Reply-To: <9601231353.AA06639@alpha> from "Mike McNally" at Jan 23, 96 07:53:48 am
From: futplex@pseudonym.com (Futplex)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Precedence: bulk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
ECafe Anonymous Remailer writes:
# Here is the RC4 cipher for the HP-48 calculator...
Mike McNally writes:
> You know, it'd be interesting to start loudly reporting such obvious
> ITAR violations. Not, of course, because I feel myself threatened as
> a result of this attack on national security, but because it might
> make life more difficult for Them.
[...]
I would feel a bit more comfortable if violations by non-anonymous entities
were well publicized. Otherwise, we may force the TLAs to cash in the
"weapons export" card against the anonymizers, and hasten a crackdown on
them. (In this particular instance, the remailer resides outside the ITAR
zone, but that detail could be conveniently ignored in calling for a ban on
U.S. remailers.)
I'm still hoping for a test of the PA anonymity prohibition....
Futplex <futplex@pseudonym.com>, still catching up on last week's mail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAwUBMQXagSnaAKQPVHDZAQHZTwf/WrHgbZjgiJIXxW886mKO/E/eoSLh0eSE
IBnfnDABTmAUcbvUEo/UMn7n7Gsq03mJgyo9z1+6SUGxhqt45MV41d7rZQVhkBWs
+woh7YqGIiqGF9elvaVUlp7xsqyKLdXVQYqkahe0M4Ouw7S033HYIC+6lW6kTBeC
C0vOnwyoB82WJ1x2SRH8iz7/lCWJkQkDSiRJ3yaAB4UtXvsikug3ddvOGz2tbL19
sxlxoJslD5MlqcH8ubKqDvHR++N432cOKMOHR82GjAm8b2f4/0lmaDWAxDaaWNFb
jk0EH5Ax8gECoBWl6dw3Sw3asWNbM0M9UIthEmOTjiJoOb9cRxjoNw==
=O3fc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
