[48149] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: "Gentlemen do not read each other's mail"

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jon Lasser)
Fri Jan 26 11:01:20 1996

Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 10:42:45 -0500 (EST)
From: Jon Lasser <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
To: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Cc: Jay Holovacs <holovacs@styx.ios.com>, hallam@w3.org, cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960126021308.19760C-100000@larry.infi.net>

On Fri, 26 Jan 1996, Alan Horowitz wrote:

> The first was in a monograph which was putting forth the proposition that 
> FDR  ardently desired to become involved in the war.  By the way, FDR was 
> the man who made wage income, subject to federal taxation for the first 
> time.
> 
> I don't remember where I read the second.
> 
> To me, both stories are plausible.

In fact, before FDR, wage income was taxed; however, it was one large 
check at the end of the yeraar (or the beginning of the next, really).

The high cost of WW II made it a necessity for the gvm't to have more 
money at a particular moment, and not wait for year-end.

I can't remember when the amendment constitutionalizing (is that a word) 
the income tax was passed; however, the income tax (and wage income was 
most certainly taxed) was AFAIK implemented by the end of the 19th century.

I might be wrong on dates here; the general principle still stands...
Jon Lasser
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lasser                <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>            (410)494-3072 
          Visit my home page at http://www.goucher.edu/~jlasser/
  You have a friend at the NSA: Big Brother is watching. Finger for PGP key.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post