[46923] in Cypherpunks
RE: Net Control is Thought Control
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Mandl)
Wed Jan 10 16:03:27 1996
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 15:41:14 -0500 (EST)
From: David Mandl <dmandl@bear.com>
To: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960110200221.006aa430@panix.com>
On Wed, 10 Jan 1996, Duncan Frissell wrote:
> Lots of content regulation in the US:
>
> Libel, slander, indecency (radio and TV), obscenity, Federal Trade
> Commission (advertizing controls), Food and Drug Administration (drug
> 'labeling' and info controls), booze and cigarette advertizing, EEOC
> (controls on discriminatory advertizing), children's television
> requirements, civil defense broadcast requirements, station identification
> requirements, civil controls on advertizing foreign financial services (did
> you know this was illegal?), civil liability for carrying 'hit man' ads,
> etc. I'd come up with more if I had more time. I'll add more over the next
> few days as I think of them.
<
> Not to mention the numerous content controls in countries other than the US.
>
> The Nets will smash all of these content controls.
So when WFMU starts broadcasting over the net, will I be able to play
smutty records on my show?
And when will I be able to add some kiddie-porn images to my web page?
--D.
P.S.: Regarding limits on "freedom of speech" in the U.S., take a look
at the long list Tim May posted a few months back. (I was scoffing at
Perry's claim that we had nearly complete freedom of speech in the
U.S., and then Tim responded with much more detail.)
--
David Mandl
Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.
Phone: (212) 272-3888
Email: dmandl@bear.com
--
*******************************************************************************
Bear Stearns is not responsible for any recommendation, solicitation, offer or
agreement or any information about any transaction, customer account or account
activity contained in this communication.
*******************************************************************************
