| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 1995 09:28:21 -0800 To: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> From: Jonathan Zamick <JonathanZ@consensus.com> Cc: Raph Levien <raph@c2.org>, cypherpunks@toad.com At 10:56 PM 11/26/95, James A. Donald wrote: >At 01:12 PM 11/27/95 -0800, Jonathan Zamick wrote: >> it >> means forming a group, made up of Cypherpunk members perhaps, but much >> smaller, and capable of working together. Also capable of handling not only >> the theory, but good solid code, GUI, PR, meetings, talking to the >> government, etc. > >Skip the talking to the government bit: Ignore, do not confront. I can't agree. The model of a successful enterprise includes feedback from different levels of participants. Regardless, the government will be taking a role in encryption. Thus even if they aren't a defining part of the development, bringing them to a limited extent into the loop, and finding even small areas which the government would support, helps provide better buy-in by the government officials who participate, helping the momentum. The point isn't to bring them into the design, but simply to use their feedback to optimize our PR approach. Jonathan ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ..Jonathan Zamick Consensus Development Corporation.. ..<JonathanZ@consensus.com> 1563 Solano Ave, #355.. .. Berkeley, CA 94707-2116.. .. o510/559-1500 f510/559-1505.. ..Mosaic/WWW Home Page: .. .. <A HREF="http://www.consensus.com/">Consensus Home Page</A> ..
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |