[43377] in Cypherpunks
Re: NSA, ITAR, NCSA and plug-in hooks.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Brickner)
Tue Nov 14 15:46:55 1995
To: Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: (Your message of Tue, 14 Nov 1995 12:58:20 EST.)
<199511141758.MAA14695@jafar.sware.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1995 14:38:50 -0600
From: Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
Jeff Barber writes:
>Does anyone know the ostensible justification for this? What section of
>the ITARs do they point to when they say "this is illegal"? I've perused
>an online copy of ITAR (no, I haven't read all of it -- I have other
>things I want to do this year :-), but I can't find a section that could
>be construed to support this contention.
I think it's 121.1, Category XIII paragraph (b) item (5):
"Ancillary equipment specifically designed or modified for paragraphs (b)
(1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) of this category;"
