[42735] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: FBI seeks huge wiretapping system

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perry E. Metzger)
Thu Nov 2 17:54:35 1995

To: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Cc: hallam@w3.org, cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 02 Nov 1995 13:24:27 CST."
             <9511021924.AA12407@alpha> 
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 1995 17:39:06 -0500
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>


Mike McNally writes:
> 
> hallam@w3.org writes:
>  > It is a fair point that just because technology has changed the 
>  > nature of the game it should not mean that wiretaps cease to be 
>  > possible.
> 
> I disagree that this is a "fair point".  That wiretaps are possible is
> an accident of design.  Just because that slice of the salami appears
> gone, I see no reason to concede that it can't be re-attached.

Indeed, I have searched both the constitution and my collected works
of Nietzsche and found no reference to the inalienable right of
governments to listen in on any conversations, let alone the 1% of
conversations the FBI wants access to. By the way, I believe the
quantity in question exceeds the quantity tapped by the East German
government at its height -- certainly it does if you take into account
the fact that phones were more scarce there.

Thank you, Louis Freeh, for taking another step towards the police state.

Perry

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post