[42089] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: PA Remailer Concerns

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lee Tien)
Mon Oct 23 22:35:54 1995

Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 18:52:52 -0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
From: tien@well.sf.ca.us (Lee Tien)

What is the cite for this statute?  

Lee

>At 11:47 PM 10/14/95 -0700, anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com wrote:
>>Has anyone examined the legislative history associated with this statute?
>>
>>I would be surprised if they were singling out anonymous remailers.  They
>may have had other concerns regarding phone abuse, e.g., long distance fraud.  
>>
>>Then again, I could be full of it...
>>
>>
>Doesn't necessarily matter what the legislative history was.  When some
>prosecutor trying to make a name for himself hooks onto this language to
>prosecute an anonymous remailer or other perceived miscreant, nobody will
>remember what the intent was.  The casebooks are full of perversions of
>original intent.
>Jon Goldberg

Lee Tien
Attorney
tien@well.sf.ca.us
(510) 525-0817 voice
(510) 525-3015 fax



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post