[41675] in Cypherpunks
Re: transaction costs in anonymous markets
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca)
Wed Oct 18 07:41:55 1995
From: s1018954@aix2.uottawa.ca
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 07:40:21 -0400 (EDT)
To: David Murray <sdavidm@iconz.co.nz>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <pnr096593132l@iconz.co.nz>
On Wed, 18 Oct 1995, David Murray wrote:
> B. Unilateral Anonymity. One party to the transaction is known, but the other
> is unknowable. An example might be subscribing for a digital security with
> ecash - the issuer is known, but the purchaser is anonymous.
>
> C. Bilateral Anonymity. The identities of both parties to the transaction
> are unknowable. This might be the case on a cypherpunk stock exchange...
Or we could use the client/server terminology when possible.
