[24788] in Cypherpunks
Re: Siegel and Lewis
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Black Unicorn)
Wed Jan 4 14:25:39 1995
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 1995 13:56:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
To: Doug Barnes <db@Tadpole.COM>
Cc: Raph Levien <raph@netcom.com>, cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <9501041424.AA25564@tadpole.tadpole.com>
On Wed, 4 Jan 1995, Doug Barnes wrote:
> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 1995 07:42:57 -0600 (CST)
> From: Doug Barnes <db@Tadpole.COM>
> To: Raph Levien <raph@netcom.com>
> Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Re: Siegel and Lewis
>
>
> Why is it that so many cypherpunks like the economist?
>
> I learned recently that Eric is a big fan. So am I. You're certainly
> not the first other cypherpunk to mention this. Weird. I mean, it's
> not exactly a radical publication... it just gets its *&#$*#$ facts
> right. Probably this is it.
I am also a fan.
I tend to focus on the subject matter economist prints. I just find it
more on target than most if not all of the major U.S. media sources.
>
> Doug
>
>
073BB885A786F666 nemo repente fuit turpissimus - potestas scientiae in usu est
6E6D4506F6EDBC17 quaere verum ad infinitum, loquitur sub rosa - wichtig!
