[24503] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: DDJ editorial

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Handler)
Sat Dec 24 11:11:33 1994

Date: Sat, 24 Dec 1994 11:05:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Handler <grendel@netaxs.com>
To: Harry Bartholomew <bart@netcom.com>
Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
In-Reply-To: <199412241236.EAA13217@netcom14.netcom.com>

On Sat, 24 Dec 1994, Harry Bartholomew wrote:

>     I think this sentence was missing a NOT:
> 
>                                     If, as some claim and RSA disputes, the
>   code was reverse-engineered from object files in off-the-shelf software,
>   then the law was probably broken - unless RSA and other vendors decide to
>   test the strength of highly questionable and likely unenforceable
>   shrink-wrap licenses that try to prohibit disassembly/decompilation.  

	No, that's correct as printed.

--
Michael Handler <grendel@netaxs.com>                        Philadelphia, PA
Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics           s.s.y.g-l-b co-moderator
               You're only as elegant as your actions let you be


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post