[116768] in Cypherpunks
No subject found in mail header
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anonymous)
Fri Aug 20 14:35:06 1999
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 20:08:21 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <199908201808.UAA08033@mail.replay.com>
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Reply-To: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
This sealed warrant authorization to commit
burglary seems even more troublesome than the
trend toward dynamic entry.
What would the legal situation be for a
homeowner who defends himself when he sees a
black-masked figure entering his home?
How about for a the black-masked figure if
he returns fire?
At least having black-clad ninjas come crashing
through your windows right after a volly of
concussion grenades is arguably not the typical MO of the criminal element. Can a citizen, at his
legal peril, be held responsible for assessing
whether the large gentleman with the sack is
a LEO or a crook? "If you're going to continue
breaking and entering, I'll have to see some ID
please"
On a lighter note: The conversation when you
call 911 could be amusing when looked upon years
later. How about a black-hat/white hat shootout
if the black-baggers don't bother to tell the
locals what's up?
ScaredMonger
