[116726] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: I be scared

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Roach)
Thu Aug 19 11:23:05 1999

Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990819090850.007ad030@mail.intplsrv.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:08:50 -0500
To: cypherpunks@algebra.com
From: Sean Roach <roach_s@mail.intplsrv.net>
In-Reply-To: <199908190542.BAA30823@domains.invweb.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To: Sean Roach <roach_s@mail.intplsrv.net>

At 01:43 AM 8/19/99 -0400, cypherpunks@openpgp.net wrote:
>
>In <3.0.5.32.19990818011629.009a4100@idiom.com>, on 08/18/99 
>   at 01:16 AM, Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com> said:
>
>>They've taught other things strangely as well - when my father was
>>growing up, his family moved a few times, and the history of the War
>>Between The States was taught rather differently than  when he'd first
>>learned it in Texas :-)
>
>Oh, you mean the War of Northern Aggression? I am sure that Kansas teaches
>it differently. :)
>
I though everyone got the "The civil war was fought over slavery, everybody
knows that" sometime during elementary, and then aa "Yeah, but..." later on
from a high school or college history teacher.

"A house divided cannot stand" has nothing to do with slavery and
everything to do with defending the nation against foreign invaders.

Just how did the teachings from TX to KS differ anyway? I'm also interested
because my fractional grasp on history retains the reason for a Kansas and
a Nebraska.




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post