[116699] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

FWD: Censor the Internet, Say Drug War Senators

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jean-Francois Avon)
Wed Aug 18 13:33:23 1999

Message-Id: <199908181709.NAA22750@cti06.citenet.net>
From: "Jean-Francois Avon" <jf_avon@citenet.net>
To: "Dagenais  Francois" <dagenais@sympatico.ca>,
        "Machineco" <machtool@total.net>, "Horvath  Peter" <cctech@cam.org>,
        "Parkinson  Sid" <sid@stlawrenceinstitute.org>,
        "Ralph C. Maddocks" <saesnig@login.net>,
        "Kelly-Gagnon,  Michel" <mkellygagnon@iedm.org>,
        "=?iso-8859-1?q?Le_Qu=E9becois_Libre?=" <ql@quebecoislibre.org>,
        "=?iso-8859-1?q?Gilles_Gu=E9nette?=" <gilles@quebecoislibre.org>,
        "Cypherpunks" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Cc: "Breitkreuz  Hon. Gary  MP" <Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca>,
        "Lorne Gunter" <lgunter@thejournal.southam.ca>,
        "Kearns  Peter" <kearns@compusmart.ab.ca>,
        "Buckner  Taylor" <tbuckner@together.net>,
        "Canadian Institute for Legislative Action" <teebee@sprint.ca>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 13:05:22 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: "Jean-Francois Avon" <jf_avon@citenet.net>

From somewhere on the site http://www.self-gov.org/
and broadcasted via Liberator Online e-newsletter
   August 17, 1999
   Vol. 4, No. 16
   Circulation: 30,330 in 79 countries


Censor the Internet, Say Drug War Senators

   A monstrous Internet censorship bill has been proposed before the U.S.
   Congress that would ban Internet *discussions* of the use of illegal
   drugs. Also banned would be sites - or even *links* to sites -- that
   sell "drug paraphernalia" (such as bongs and rolling paper) or that
   merely discuss how such items are used.

   As WIRED News notes, "Even editors of news organizations that publish
   articles about drug culture and link to related sites will be subject
   to arrest and prosecution."

   The bill covers "the use of any communications facility to post,
   publicize, transmit, publish, link to, broadcast, or otherwise
   advertise" drug paraphernalia-related information. The bill would make
   such acts punishable by a fine and three years in prison.

   A second part of the bill makes it a felony - punishable by up to ten
   years in prison - to distribute "by any means" information about "the
   manufacture or use of a controlled substance" if the recipient of such
   information intends to use it to get high or otherwise violate the
   law. (Thought crime, anyone?)

   Even something as seemingly mild as a link to "High Times" magazine
   could become a felony under the bill.

   The bill, deceptively entitled the "Methamphetamine Anti-Proliferation
   Act," was introduced in early August. (Too bad we don't have
   truth-in-labeling laws regarding bill titles. "The Anti-First
   Amendment, Anti-Liberty Internet Censorship and Control Act, Spawned
   by Despots and Tyrants," for example, would be so much more accurate.)

   A dozen or so senators have signed on as supporters. The Clinton
   administration thus far has refused to take a position on the bill.

   Primary supporters of the bi-partisan bill are Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
   and Orrin Hatch (R-UT). This same duo brought us 1996's "Dirty Pixels"
   law, which made it a felony to own or manufacture computer-generated
   (i.e., not real) images of nude children.

   In the past Feinstein has also supported encryption bans, censoring of
   Internet bomb-making information, mandatory national ID cards, and gun
   bans. Jeesh.

   (Sources: WIRED News, Aug. 14; "Time"; Associated Press; NORML)



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post