[109697] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Encryption

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anonymous)
Thu Apr 1 23:34:04 1999

Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 06:20:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Reply-To: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>

   A  key  US senator  said  Wednesday he was  going to  introduce  new
   encryption  legislation.  But the  proposal is  likely to leave  all
   sides wanting more.

   John McCain, the Arizona Republican who chairs the Senate's Commerce
   Committee, painted the legislation as a compromise.

   "This  bill  protects our  national  security  and  law  enforcement
   interests  while maintaining  the  United States leadership role  in
   information technology," he said.

   For  years  high-tech  firms  have  struggled  against  the  Clinton
   administration's  rules restricting the overseas sales of encryption
   products, arguing that they doom  American companies to second-place
   finishes in the race to expand the e-commerce market.

   McCain's bill relaxes the White House rules. But  it does not remove
   them.

   "It's uninspired. It's a nonsolution if I've ever seen one," complains
   Alex Fowler, a spokesman for the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

   Business lobbyists also offered faint praise. "The bill doesn't go as
   far or as fast  as the Security and Freedom through Encryption Act,"
   said  Ed  Gillespie,  executive  director of  Americans for Computer
   Privacy.

   Representative Robert Goodlatte (R-Virginia) is championing the SAFE
   bill  in the House,  as he did  with scant success last  session. No
   companion legislation has been introduced in the Senate.

   Law  enforcement lobbyists  are  hardly likely to  support  McCain's
   proposal.

   For years, US Department of Justice and  FBI  officials have pressed
   for  new  federal  laws making it  a  crime  to  distribute  or sell
   unapproved encryption products, including  Web  browsers  and Eudora
   plug-ins. FBI Director Louis Freeh convinced one  House committee in
   the last  Congress to approve such a ban,  and he has shown no signs
   of changing his mind.

   "I  have  not  given   up  on  encryption,"  Freeh   told  a  Senate
   appropriations committee in February.

   "Law   enforcement   remains   in  unanimous  agreement   that   the
   continued  widespread  availability  and  increasing use  of strong,
   nonrecoverable encryption products will  soon nullify  our effective
   use of court-authorized electronic surveillance and the execution of
   lawful search and seizure warrants. The loss  of  these capabilities
   will devastate our capabilities for fighting crime, preventing  acts
   of terrorism, and protecting the national security," Freeh said.

   McCain's bill allows the  export of encryption  products with  up to
   64-bit length keys, an increase over current 56-bit limits.

   It also creates an encryption export advisory board that would render
   advice on export applications, though  the Commerce Department would
   make the final decisions. The new federal bureaucracy  would be made
   up of 12  members, with automatic representation from  the CIA, NSA,
   and the White House.

   Although the text of the legislation has not been made  public,  its
   biggest  impact may be in showing McCain is  softening his  position
   on encryption. Previously he  was  one of  the  Senate's  most vocal
   supporters  of  government-coerced key  escrow,  which  would  build
   surveillance  capability into software  and  hardware  products. Now
   he's hardly a  friend  of  strong encryption,  but he's  no longer a
   hardened adversary.

   "The announcement is most notable because it represents a major shift
   in positioning.... Senator McCain was previously  a major  supporter
   of administration encryption policy and opponent of encryption relief
   efforts," an analysis published Wednesday by the Center for Democracy
   and Technology said.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post