[109599] in Cypherpunks
Re: P1363: RSA claiming trademark on all uses of "RSA" to
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Don Johnson)
Tue Mar 30 17:07:29 1999
From: "Don Johnson" <djohnson@certicom.com>
To: "Peter G. Neumann" <neumann@csl.sri.com>
cc: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>, cypherpunks@toad.com, jya@pipeline.com,
gnu@toad.com, stds-p1363@mail.ieee.org, ipsec@tis.com
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 16:24:46 -0500
Reply-To: "Don Johnson" <djohnson@certicom.com>
I kinda liked the biprime proposal. This distinguishes it from the prime
DL/ECC methods.
Don Johnson
"Peter G. Neumann" <neumann@csl.sri.com> on 03/30/99 01:17:06 PM
Please respond to "Peter G. Neumann" <neumann@csl.sri.com>
To: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
cc: cypherpunks@toad.com, jya@pipeline.com, gnu@toad.com,
stds-p1363@mail.ieee.org, ipsec@tis.com (bcc: Don Johnson/Certicom)
Subject: Re: P1363: RSA claiming trademark on all uses of "RSA" to
describe algorithm
Note: Some recipients have been dropped due to syntax errors.
Please refer to the "$AdditionalHeaders" item for the complete headers.
--------------------------------------------------------------
This is a stds-p1363 broadcast. See the IEEE P1363 web page
(http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363/) for more information,
including how to subscribe/unsubscribe.
--------------------------------------------------------------
I suppose QRZ (RSA-1) is NOT appropriate.
How about RiShAd?
