|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 04:06:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com> To: cypherpunks@toad.com Reply-To: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com> gburnore@databasix.com (Gary L. Burnore) wrote: > >> And you still haven't answered, Ron. > > > >If you want an answer from Ron Guilmette, email him. How do you > >expect him to know whether DataBasux is operating illegally or not? > >Your vendetta against Ron has been so strong that if you knew > >ANYTHING that could be used to harass him, you'd have used it > >against him long ago. Apparently that pathetic 10 year old tax lien > >that had long since been paid was the best you could do. And even > >that demonstrated more about you than it did about him. Your > >threats and those of your cronies at DataBaSUCKS are totally empty, > >idle, and baseless. You and Belinda seem to be getting desperate! > > > >The fact is that you have no idea who anonymously blew the whistle > >on you and your molestation, and that bothers you, doesn't it? > > Poor poor ronnie Guilmette, tax evading owner of escrub technologies. > You keep lying and getting caught. No one blew any wistle anywhere. > No one KNEW about the issue until _I_ said something and even then, > it's not molestation. The facts contradict your lies once again, Gary. You yourself complained about anonymous e-mail going to your fiancee, the 17 year old girl's mother, in February of 1997, the month BEFORE you were convicted. There is no indication when the e-mail was actually sent, but you first whined about it in 2/97. If, as you claim, "No one KNEW about the issue until _I_ said something", then you'd better search your mind and try to recall who you foolishly bragged about it to, because obviously someone found out! Is that the real reason you were arrested, even though, allegedly, neither your victim nor her mother wanted to press charges? Was the e-mail Cced to someone who would not ignore it, but had a legal DUTY to report it? > Too bad you got caught spamming again and needed to attempt a > diversion by bugging me again. Doesn't work anymore. Nope. Not > at all. The fact that you replied says differently. If you want to fight "spam", there are better ways than to harass someone like you're doing with unproven charges of "tax evasion". Feel free to blather on and on endlessly about this "spam" in some of the antispam NGs. But being spammed is not even close to being an excuse to molest a child! > People can do dejanews searches and see the obsession that is you and > Victor and Odious and Tim Thorne. How would you know? Are you one of the "stalkers" that you claimed uses DejaNews for that purpose? > They see you and them together in > netkookville. Good. Exactly as planned both for you and for > Victor. Your plans have a habit of backfiring. > You've shown your hand and it failed. You picked sides and picked the > wrong one. Just like the OTHER three morons. The only difference Ron, > is that you continue to be the most cowardly of the four. Hiding > behind a remailer. Abusing that remailer when it suits you and then > claiming everyone ELSE is trying to get remailers closed down. Your "hiding behind a remailer" whine is really getting old. If others want to give their identities to convicted child molesters with a proven track record of abuse and harassment, that's their option. Evidently the person who blew the whistle on you decided not to take that risk. > You lose again Ron. You always do when you mess with me. No one cares > anymore. Business is great. Money is fine. Life is good. You're > still obsessed. You still lose. > > Yep. Life IS good. So run along now little anonymous asshole Ron > Guilmette. You know that I know that you are ... You're the one that can't resist replying as a knee-jerk reaction. > Never thought I'd bring myself to killfiling an anonymous address. > There ARE people using replay who DO have something valid to say. > It's jerkoffs like you who ALWAYS ruin it for everyone else. Cut the crap. Can you cite any post of yours where you've EVER had ANYTHING positive to say about ANY anonymous poster? Yep, if the news is bad, you'd best ignore it ... especially if you can't evade the message by attacking the messenger. > Gbye Ronnie. > > *plonk* I'll miss your asinine responses, Gary. (And no fair replying throug Belind or one of your DataBasix sock puppets.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |