|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 07:15:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com> To: cypherpunks@toad.com Reply-To: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com> gburnore@databasix.com (Gary L. Burnore) wrote: > >>:> X-RFG-Is-an-asshole: True > >>: > >>: Two years have passed, and you're still pissed at Ron Guilmette? > >> > >>I'm not pissed at you Ron. You're a tax evading net abuser. > > > >I'm not aware that Ron was part of this thread, Gary. Your > >paranoia is showing. If you've got evidence that he's a tax evader, > >then I'm sure you would have reported him by now. > > > >Back when you first started attacking Ron in 1997, you asked whether > >his business was properly licensed in Santa Rosa. > > And you still haven't answered, Ron. If you want an answer from Ron Guilmette, email him. How do you expect him to know whether DataBasux is operating illegally or not? Your vendetta against Ron has been so strong that if you knew ANYTHING that could be used to harass him, you'd have used it against him long ago. Apparently that pathetic 10 year old tax lien that had long since been paid was the best you could do. And even that demonstrated more about you than it did about him. Your threats and those of your cronies at DataBaSUCKS are totally empty, idle, and baseless. You and Belinda seem to be getting desperate! The fact is that you have no idea who anonymously blew the whistle on you and your molestation, and that bothers you, doesn't it? Your attempt to make it look like "harassment" and to pin it on Ron backfired and you inadvertantly confirmed what you naively assumed would not become public knowledge later. You guessed, wrongly, that Jeff Burchell and his Huge Cajones Remailer kept the logs necessary for you to identify and harass the sender. Instead, Jeff chose to expose YOU and your harassment against him. > >BTW, while you claim that the mug shot on Tim's site is not of you, > >you have offered no explanation of why he would link a phony one to > >his page and not the real one of you that was once on the North > >Carolina Sex Offender Site. > > It's Tim Thorne. That's explination enough. Anyone reading Tim Thorne > for more than a day, (Other than you, Ron Guilmette) would know he's a > net-kook. Perhaps the state of North Carolina, where you fled to escape the stigma of being a convicted, registered child molestor in California, designed their website where even a "net-kook" could find out about sexual predators living in the neighborhood. > >And your charges of "copyright > >violation" are bogus, too. If it's not a real mugshot, then why > >would the State of North Carolina want to claim any copyright > >protection over it? > > Their state image is on the page, no? Their copyright is on the > bottom, no? What are you afraid of, ronnie? If it is not an accurate reproduction of the original, and if the mugshot is not genuine, as you claim, then it would be considered a mere parody and hardly worthy of a copyright battle. Maybe your phony "lawyer" Belinda can explain to you that a blank form cannot be copyrighted. And obviously there would be no copyright rights over allegedly "bogus" data and photo that did not originate from the state agency. > >Anyone wishing to view the recreation of your sex offender registry > >page may do so at: > > > > http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~thorne/dungeon/defectgb1.htm > > It's not my picture and it's not my stats. But feel free to make a > further fool of yourself and of Timmy. So Tim is really trying to protect you by not reporting information that would embarass you? That's comforting, isn't it? The problem is, you don't really KNOW how many people saw the ORIGINAL page before it got yanked on a technicality, do you? > >And to the "Anonymous Asshole <tm>", why not just give your asshole > >a name to placate Gary? > > Oh yawn Ronnie. Your attempts to decieve and hide failed again. You > give far to many clues as to your identity with each post you > make. So when is loudmouth Belinda going to make Ron's "life a living hell" for insulting poor innocent, sensitive Gary? If you know it's him, why can't you convince her? Or has another empty bluff of hers been called? She's also "threatened" to post the police report to prove me wrong. I challenged her to go ahead and do it. So far, nothing. DataBaSUCKS seems to be firing blanks these days. > Poor ronnie. All you'd have to do is stop posting. :) That would be no fun, seeing as how you are powerless to ignore posts about you. The fact that you continue to participate in these threads indicates that you wish them to continue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |