[109504] in Cypherpunks

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: About Alpha radiation...

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jean-Francois Avon)
Fri Mar 26 19:35:12 1999

From: "Jean-Francois Avon" <jf_avon@citenet.net>
To: "Cypherpunks" <cypherpunks@toad.com>,
        "Marty Levy" <rwww60@email.sps.mot.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 12:00:49 -0500
Reply-To: "Jean-Francois Avon" <jf_avon@citenet.net>

On Fri, 26 Mar 1999 07:31:52 +0000, Marty Levy wrote:

>Alpha particles are a major source of bit disturb errors in terrestrial-usage
>semiconductors.  The primary source is the packaging used to encapsulate the
>chip.  Low alpha mold compounds can reduce this in plastic encapsulated
>devices, but cannot eliminate it.  The presence of alpha generators in 
ceramic
>packages is even more difficult to control.  Trench-style DRAM cells are less
>susceptible to alpha upsets due to the protection afforded by the silicon
>substrate.  Multiple levels of interconnect also improve the situation, but 
of
>course shrinking device geometries make it worse.
>
>There is a great deal of literature on this subject for anyone who really 
wants
>to know.  I would start with IEDM, IRPS (International Reliability Physics
>Symposium) and various IEEE societies dealing with solid-state devices.

Thanks for the info.

My original comment was aimed at that post:

---------- 
No,
    my table companion worked for a private company and the government
    in question is UK's. I asked him why government ciphers are still
    implemented in hardware and not in software working in dedicated
    one chip computers. Apparently speed is not the answer - very high
    security communication is really low bandwidth. I didn't find his
    answers very convincing: He said that an alpha particle from space
    can knock out a transistor in the chip and modify the cipher. Then
    again it is a trivial matter to have not one but many CPUs
----------

Ciao

jfa



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post