[108015] in Cypherpunks
Re: HEY ANONYMOUS...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anonymous)
Mon Feb 1 06:44:22 1999
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 12:29:53 +0100
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Reply-To: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
"Bernardo B. Terrado" <bbt@mudspring.uplb.edu.ph> wrote in
<Pine.GSO.4.05.9902011115570.11951-100000@mudspring.uplb.edu.ph>
on 01/31/99 at 10:25 PM:
>I'm tired. I'll buzz off your case. It's useless arguing with you. If
>you reply to this message with those full of fucking lame words then
>so be it. It's really useless.
>:)
>More power to remailers? to anonimity?
>:)
you know - we are living in a big, big world, and there are (many)
different goverments in different societies.
These goverments do not like free speech - so what oppertunities have
people in these countries? - they have to post "untraceable".
or maybe think of all these "govermental" workers - sometimes
the have something to say, which isn't so good for them.
for a better understanding some fucking lame words:
"the ethical responsibility for privacy protection lies with those who
would violate that privacy, and with those who design and provide the
systems where the violations can occur."
(ELECTRONIC PRIVACY PRINCIPLES
http://www.cpsr.org/program/privacy/privacy8.htm)
tms
------------
"1.think, 2.think again ..... and 3.speak"
