[107490] in Cypherpunks
Re: Spam spam spam spam...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Zane Lewkowicz)
Fri Jan 15 01:26:53 1999
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 07:13:02 +0100 (MET)
From: Zane Lewkowicz <zooko@xs4all.nl>
To: cypherpunks@algebra.com
In-Reply-To: <f2e021b2ea033f6820701343854988c6@anonymous>
Reply-To: Zane Lewkowicz <zooko@xs4all.nl>
In article <f2e021b2ea033f6820701343854988c6@anonymous> you write:
>
>Okie; I'm routing all my mail onto this list through Anonymizer; I figure that, if so many spammers are broadcasting on the channel, they're probably sniffing it for addys too...
>
Hooray for spammers! They're encouraging people to upgrade
their own tech in an "arms race". If you'll CTFA [*], you'll
see that i correctly predicted this outcome in... um.. some
year, and used it as one of arguments in favor of legalized
spam.
Regards,
Zooko (who got only 1 spam (in two copies) in response to his
most recent post to cypherpunks)
P.S. Ross W.: your Spam Defense t-shirt is carefully folded up
on top of my dresser. I plan to mail it off Real Soon Now.
P.P.S. "World Record Sex! Annie Chong takes on one thousand
cypherpunks..."
[*] "Check The Archives"
