[105023] in Cypherpunks
RE: dbts: Privacy Fetishes, Perfect Competition, and the Foregone
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Petro)
Wed Nov 4 14:04:24 1998
In-Reply-To:
<5F152E6E8E6FD21195DF00104B2425AD02B226@yarrowbay.chaffeyhomes.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 12:29:19 -0500
To: "'dbs@philodox.com'" <dbs@philodox.com>,
"'cypherpunks@cyberpass.net'" <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>,
"'e$@vmeng.com'" <e$@vmeng.com>
From: Petro <petro@playboy.com>
Reply-To: Petro <petro@playboy.com>
At 5:31 PM -0500 11/2/98, Matthew James Gering wrote:
>> paradox of financial cryptography, and, more specifically,
>> digital bearer settlement, is not that it gives you privacy
>> and freedom (anarchy? :-))
>
>Anarchy !=3D privacy
However, Privacy + Freedom =3D=3D Anarchy, or close enough to be
indistinguishable.
>In fact to many people privacy is a very statist construct, as they clamor
>for more privacy regulations by government.
No, to many people, the Government is a magical device that can
repeal the laws of physics, and change peoples hearts. They don't think
that government can *create* privacy, they think it is willing or able to
*enforce* it.
Then again, there is little enough evidence of thougt amoung "many
people".
--
"To sum up: The entire structure of antitrust statutes in this country is a
jumble of economic irrationality and ignorance. It is a product: (a) of a
gross misinterpretation of history, and (b) of rather na=EFve, and certainly
unrealistic, economic theories." Alan Greenspan, "Anti-trust"
http://www.ecosystems.net/mgering/antitrust.html
Petro::E-Commerce Adminstrator::Playboy Ent. Inc.::petro@playboy.com
