[103572] in Cypherpunks
RE: GPL & commercial software, the critical distinction (fwd)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vlad Stesin)
Wed Sep 30 00:41:29 1998
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 00:21:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vlad Stesin <rmiles@Generation.NET>
To: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
cc: Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer <cypherpunks@einstein.ssz.com>
In-Reply-To: <199809300345.WAA10211@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply-To: Vlad Stesin <rmiles@Generation.NET>
>
> Solaris, HP, BSD, NT, etc. *wish* they were as stable and popular as Linux.
>
Which BSD are you talking about? From my personal and professional
experience, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD proved to be just as stable (and
OpenBSD even more stable and reliable) than Linux. All three of them are
open-source. The OpenBSD project emphasizes the importance of security and
cryptography, and since it ships from Canada there are few export
restrictions.
Take a look at http://www.openbsd.org/crypto.html for more info.
I hope you meant BSD/OS when you mentioned BSD :-)
Regards,
--
Vlad Stesin (514) 845-5555
UNIX Systems Administrator / Generation.NET vstesin@Generation.NET
Montreal (PQ), Canada B4 44 CE 60 09 71 38 6F 51 BF DC 5F 12 E9 70 7C