[103161] in Cypherpunks
RE: atheism (was: RE: Democracy... (fwd)) (fwd)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew James Gering)
Mon Sep 21 17:32:10 1998
From: Matthew James Gering <mgering@ecosystems.net>
To: "Cypherpunks (E-mail)" <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:09:30 -0700
Reply-To: Matthew James Gering <mgering@ecosystems.net>
Jim Choate wrote:
> As I've demonstrated before (and for the last time):
>
> ^(A) = (^A)
f() = belief function
A = hypothesis
^ = not
f(^A) != ^f(A)
At least not without placing requirements on f().
Then you claim everything is a belief, so f() is meaningless. But then
you deny A == A when you claimed that metaphysical objectivity is a
belief, so what was the point in writing the equation in the first
place?
Go transcend.
Matt
