[102817] in Cypherpunks
Re: Clinton still doesnt get it
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anonymous)
Wed Sep 16 14:15:21 1998
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 20:00:31 +0200
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Reply-To: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Frondeur writes:
> Why do you believe the perjury case has `reasonable doubt' problems?
Watch TV and learn the answer. It's only perjury if it's material,
and the judge said it wasn't material.
> And the abuse of power case seems thin even to a non-lawyer. But
> where does the `executive privilege stuff' come in? I don't see
> that Starr listed that among his possible grounds for impeachment.
Among the grounds Starr listed was Clinton's attempt to delay the
investigation by raising many legal objections. He claimed privilege,
for example, with respect to Secret Service testimony. Most of his
efforts were ultimately overruled.
