[32044] in RISKS Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Risks Digest 32.16

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (RISKS List Owner)
Fri Jul 31 06:18:50 2020

From: RISKS List Owner <risko@csl.sri.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 22:17:55 PDT
To: risks@mit.edu

RISKS-LIST: Risks-Forum Digest  Thursday 30 July 2020  Volume 32 : Issue 16

ACM FORUM ON RISKS TO THE PUBLIC IN COMPUTERS AND RELATED SYSTEMS (comp.risks)
Peter G. Neumann, founder and still moderator

***** See last item for further information, disclaimers, caveats, etc. *****
This issue is archived at <http://www.risks.org> as
  <http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/32.16>
The current issue can also be found at
  <http://www.csl.sri.com/users/risko/risks.txt>

  Contents:
Theoretical Physicists Say 90% Chance of Societal Collapse Within Several
  Decades (VICE)
The Panopticon Is Already Here: Chinese AI Creating Axis of Autocracy
  (The Atlantic)
Let a thousand poppies bloom, thanks to cheap solar power (Areu)
Hackers broke into real news sites to plant fake stories (WiReD)
How Government Entities Use Geolocation Data To Identify Everyone (Shtfplan)
Scientists Goofed and Accidentally Created a New Kind of Fish
  (Popular Mechanics)
Apple's CEO Just Made This Extraordinary Statement About the Company's Most
  Important Product (INC)
An unprecedented Nintendo leak turns into a moral dilemma for archivists
  (The Verge)
Hospital lab tests delayed by "Twilight Zone" births (Paul Eggert)
In Portland, getting out of jail requires relinquishing constitutional
  rights (ProPublica)
Here's Trump's Plan To Regulate Social Media (Forbes)
Trump's ... new Postmaster General wants your mail to be late or lost ...
  (NPR)
America's *Frontlline Doctors*? (Gizmodo)
Re: When tax prep is free, you may be paying with your privacy (Greg Searle)
Re: Long-Lost Computation Dissertation of Unix Pioneer Dennis Ritchie
  (Bob Wilson)
Re: Darwin's tautology? (Henry Baker, Bob Wilson, Martin Ward)
CFIA investigating mysterious shipments of seeds landing in mailboxes (CBC)
Abridged info on RISKS (comp.risks)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:46:20 -1000
From: geoff goodfellow <geoff@iconia.com>
Subject: Theoretical Physicists Say 90% Chance of Societal Collapse Within
  Several Decades (VICE)

*Deforestation and rampant resource use is likely to trigger the
'irreversible collapse' of human civilization unless we rapidly change
course.*

Two theoretical physicists specializing in complex systems conclude that
global deforestation due to human activities is on track to trigger the
*irreversible collapse of human civilization within the next two to four
decades.

If we continue destroying and degrading the world's forests, Earth will no
longer be able to sustain a large human population, according to a
peer-reviewed paper <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-63657-6>
published this May in Nature Scientific Reports. They say that if the rate
of deforestation continues, ``all the forests would disappear approximately
in 100 to 3200 years.''

"Clearly it is unrealistic to imagine that the human society would start to
be affected by the deforestation only when the last tree would be cut
down," they write.

This trajectory would make the collapse of human civilization take place
much earlier due to the escalating impacts of deforestation on the
planetary life-support systems necessary for human survival -- including
carbon storage, oxygen production, soil conservation, water cycle
regulation, support for natural and human food systems, and homes for
countless species.

In the absence of these critical services, ``it is highly unlikely to
imagine the survival of many species, including ours, on Earth without
[forests].  The progressive degradation of the environment due to
deforestation would heavily affect human society and consequently the human
collapse would start much earlier.''

The paper is written by Dr Gerardo Aquino, a research associate at the Alan
Turing Institute in London currently working on political, economic and
cultural complex system modeling to predict conflicts; along with Professor
Mauro Bologna of the Department of Electronic Engineering at the University
of Tarapac=C3=A1 in Chile.

Both scientists are career physicists. Aquino has previously conducted
research at the Biological Physics Groups at Imperial College, the Max
Planck Institute of Complex Systems and the Mathematical Biology group at
the University of Surrey.

Their research models current rates of population growth and deforestation
as a proxy for resource consumption, to calculate the chance of
civilization avoiding catastrophic collapse.

Point of no return.  [...]
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/akzn5a/theoretical-physicists-say-90-chance-of-societal-collapse-within-several-decades

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:22:15 -1000
From: geoff goodfellow <geoff@iconia.com>
Subject: The Panopticon Is Already Here: Chinese AI Creating Axis of Autocracy
  (The Atlantic)

*Xi Jinping is using artificial intelligence to enhance his government's
totalitarian control -- and he's exporting this technology to regimes around
the globe.* [...]
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/09/china-ai-surveillance/614197/

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:43:12 -0700
From: Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com>
Subject: Let a thousand poppies bloom, thanks to cheap solar power (Areu)

Oops!  Cheap solar power makes Afghan poppy farmers profitable.

It's nice to see how cheap Chinese solar panels are being used to combat
global warming, by replacing diesel.

BTW, a similar-sized solar system installed at my home in California would
cost $40,000 instead of $4,000 (including the Taliban tax).  Perhaps I need
to bring over some Afghan solar installers to the U.S. ?

``farmers began to experiment with solar power as early as 2014, a time when
many were experiencing losses on their opium crop.  By 2018, there were more
than 50,000 solar deepwells, and projections indicate that there were at
least 63,000 in 2019.''

``This farmer reported paying the equivalent of US$12,200 to install a solar
deepwell, complaining that the recurrent costs on his diesel deepwell had
been $1,757 per year for maintenance and diesel.''

``Whereas in 2013, all of those interviewed in Bakwa fueled their deepwells
with diesel and none used solar power, by 2017, 68 percent were using solar,
and 98 percent of respondents had solar tubewells in 2018.''

``For example, when solar was first introduced, farmers used as many as 60
of the smaller 150 Amp (1.5 metre) panels to power their deepwells.  By
2017, there were signs of much larger panels in use, typically 300 Amp (2.5
metre).  Thirty of these panels generate more power and allow a greater
amount of water to be pumped, an advantage given the falling water table.''

``more recent improvements in technology have also led to integrated
systems, including the ability to store solar power in batteries, making
solar a more attractive and reliable energy source than ever before.  The
result is, after an initial outlay of around $5,000 to $7,000 (depending on
depth and the number of panels), solar technology can be used with very few
recurrent costs (see Table 2).''

``There was consensus of a notable change in the water table since the
increase in the uptake of solar technology. For example, while farmers
reported that the water table was falling from one-half to one metre per
year when diesel was the primary method for pumping ground water, they
report that the water table fell by as much as two to three metres per year
in 2018.  There was little doubt that the fall in the water table was a
direct function of the significant uptick in the number of farmers using
solar technology.''

https://areu.org.af/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2010E-When-the-Water-Runs-Dry-WB.pdf.pdf

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:56:26 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: Hackers broke into real news sites to plant fake stories (WiReD)

A disinfo operation broke into the content management systems of Eastern European media outlets in a campaign to spread misinformation about NATO.

https://www.wired.com/story/hackers-broke-into-real-news-sites-to-plant-fake-stories-anti-nato/

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:23:16 -1000
From: geoff goodfellow <geoff@iconia.com>
Subject: How Government Entities Use Geolocation Data To Identify Everyone
  (Shtfplan)

https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/how-government-entities-use-geolocation-data-to-identify-everyone_07302020

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 10:45:20 -1000
From: geoff goodfellow <geoff@iconia.com>
Subject: Scientists Goofed and Accidentally Created a New Kind of Fish
  (Popular Mechanics)

*In an effort to save the Russian sturgeon, scientists accidentally created
a fish hybrid while breeding the endangered species in captivity.*

 - A new paper <https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4425/11/7/753> in *Genes*
   describes how two different types of fish (sturgeon and paddlefish) bred
   to create hybrid offspring.

 - The creation of these hybrid *sturddlefish* was accidental and occurred
   in a lab in Hungary while researchers were trying to breed Russian
   sturgeons in captivity because the fish is endangered (with some sturgeon
   species being critically endangered.)
   <https://wwf.panda.org/knowledge_hub/endangered_species/sturgeon/>

     [Sturdlefish?  or Padgeon if it nibbles at morsels?  PGN]

In a wild turn of events, a new kind of fish has been born in a lab
*entirely by accident*. The sturddlefish is a hybrid between a Russian
sturgeon (*Acipenser gueldenstaedtii*) and an American paddlefish and came
into existence by accident.  [...]
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/animals/a33394119/scientists-accidentally-create-hybrid-fish/

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:25:15 -1000
From: geoff goodfellow <geoff@iconia.com>
Subject: Apple's CEO Just Made This Extraordinary Statement About the
  Company's Most Important Product (INC)

*Is the App Store a product or a feature?*

The biggest tech news this week is the antitrust hearing before Congress
that involved the CEOs of four of the largest tech companies in the world,
Apple, Facebook, Google, and Amazon. I'm generally not someone who thinks
these hearings do much to advance the cause of, well, anything beyond
scoring political points.
<https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/why-congress-is-about-to-ruin-its-best-chance-to-hold-big-tech-companies-accountable.html>
<https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/4-things-facebook-google-dont-want-you-know-about-privacy-what-you-should-do.html>

To that end, the format left plenty to be desired, including the fact that
more than one of the most powerful tech leaders in the world had technical
difficulties with their Cisco WebEx connection.  The hearing even stopped at
one point to fix a "problem with the connection."
<https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/worried-about-zoom-here-are-some-alternatives.html>

There were plenty of bad questions, this being Congress after all.  That
doesn't mean that everyone's motivation was wrong, it's just that for the
most part, Congress isn't that great at understanding or investigating
anything related to technology and the Internet.
<https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/the-federal-government-looks-ready-to-pick-a-fight-with-big-tech-heres-why-there-wont-be-any-winners-if-they-do.html>

Still, there was one extraordinary statement from Apple's CEO, Tim Cook,
that's worth a deeper look.

The first question for Cook was quite pointed, and remarkably simple:
``Apple is the sole decision-maker as to whether an app is made available
through the App Store, isn't that correct?''  Representative Hank Johnson
from Georgia asked.

"Sir ... the App Store is a feature of the iPhone much like the camera is,
and much like the chip is," said Cook before Johnson repeated the same
question.

Think about that for a moment. Theater aside, that's the most insightful
answer I've heard for how Apple views the App Store. I'm not saying it's
necessarily a good reason, but it certainly sheds light on why Apple exerts
the level of control that it does, including its review process.

To Apple, the App Store is a feature. It isn't a platform for developers,
it's a part of the product Apple sells, just like the camera. According to
Apple, that justifies the level of control it exerts.

"Because we care so deeply about privacy and security and quality, we do
look at every app," said Cook to another of Johnson's questions.  [...]
https://www.inc.com/jason-aten/apples-ceo-made-this-extraordinary-statement-about-companys-most-controversial-product.html

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:21:52 -0400
From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com>
Subject: An unprecedented Nintendo leak turns into a moral dilemma for
  archivists (The Verge)

For the past week, Nintendo fans have resembled digital
archaeologists. Following a massive leak of source code and other internal
documents — appropriately dubbed the gigaleak — previously unknown details
from the company’s biggest games have steadily trickled out. Those poring
over the code have uncovered a new Animal Crossing villager, early
prototypes for games like Pokémon Diamond, cut characters from Star Fox, a
very weird Yoshi, and strange titles like a hockey RPG. Perhaps the biggest
discovery has been a Luigi character model from Super Mario 64.

>From a historical and preservationist perspective, the leak is an
incredible find. It’s a rare look into the process and discarded ideas of
one of the most influential — and secretive — companies in video games. But
for those preservationists digging through the data, that excitement is
tainted by a moral dilemma. The origins of the code leak are still largely
unknown, but it’s likely that it was obtained illegally. That presents a
pertinent question: does the source of the leak tarnish all that historians
can learn from it?  [...]

https://www.theverge.com/2020/7/30/21347074/nintendo-gigaleak-controversy-history-preservation-archives

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:14:38 -0700
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Subject: Hospital lab tests delayed by "Twilight Zone" births

In a paper published today by the Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine,
Andrew Lyon and collaborators describe a series of crashes in a hospital lab
information system that used handheld wireless devices to identify patients
in the Jim Pattison Children's Hospital, which opened last year in
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. JPCH has pediatric and maternal services, and also
has an emergency room. The SoftID-based system first crashed 19 days after
installation, and continued to crash roughly every two weeks thereafter. Lab
staff reverted to paper procedures during crashes.

To help diagnose the crashes, the hospital's support team sent logs to the
SoftID developers, who eventually tracked the problem down to elderly
patients with birthdays like April 13, 1941, a day when most of
Saskatchewan's clocks sprang forward at midnight due to a daylight-saving
time transition. A patient with birthday on that date would have their birth
time default to 00:00, a time that did not exist in Saskatoon because the
clocks had already been switched to 01:00. The Joda-Time software within
SoftID used the IANA time zone database to translate times, and crashed
because the local time was invalid.

Lyon et al. suggest several takeaways from this software glitch, including:

* A DST transition can disrupt hospital operations long after the transition.

* Hospital software and hardware systems should be validated by test-patient
  records with birth dates on daylight-saving transitions.

My own takeaway for politicians and legislators is:

* Do not mess with the clock at midnight.

Lyon AW, Delayen K, Reddekopp R. "No Lab Tests" When You Are Born in The
Twilight Zone: A Clinical Informatics Case Report [published online ahead of
print, 2020 Jul 30]. J Appl Lab Med. 2020;jfaa080.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaa080

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 09:24:16 -1000
From: the keyboard of geoff goodfellow <geoff@iconia.com>
Subject: In Portland, getting out of jail requires relinquishing
  constitutional rights (ProPublica)

*A dozen protesters facing federal charges are barred from going to *public
gatherings* as a condition of release from jail -- a tactic one expert
described as ``sort of hilariously unconstitutional.''*

Federal authorities are using a new tactic in their battle against
protesters in Portland, Oregon: arrest them on offenses as minor as *failing
to obey* an order to get off a sidewalk on federal property -- and then tell
them they can't protest anymore as a condition for release from jail.

Legal experts describe the move as a blatant violation of the
constitutional right to free assembly, but at least 12 protesters arrested
in recent weeks have been specifically barred from attending protests or
demonstrations as they await trials on federal misdemeanor charges.

``Defendant may not attend any other protests, rallies, assemblies or public
gathering in the state of Oregon,'' states one *Order Setting Conditions of
Release* for an accused protester, alongside other conditions such as
appearing for court dates. The orders are signed by federal magistrate
judges.

For other defendants, the restricted area is limited to Portland, where
clashes between protesters and federal troops have grown increasingly
violent in recent weeks. In at least two cases, there are no geographic
restrictions; one release document instructs, ``Do not participate in any
protests, demonstrations, rallies, assemblies while this case is pending.''

Protesters who have agreed to stay away from further demonstrations say they
felt forced to accept those terms to get out of jail.  [...]
https://www.propublica.org/article/defendant-shall-not-attend-protests-in-portland-getting-out-of-jail-requires-relinquishing-constitutional-rights

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:24:01 +0900
From: farber@keio.jp
Subject: Here's Trump's Plan To Regulate Social Media (Forbes)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/robpegoraro/2020/07/28/heres-trumps-plan-to-regulate-social-media/

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:35:06 -0700
From: Lauren Weinstein <lauren@vortex.com>
Subject: Trump's ... new Postmaster General wants your mail to be late
  or lost (NPR)

https://www.npr.org/2020/07/29/894799516/pending-postal-service-changes-could-delay-mail-and-deliveries-advocates-warn?utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=news

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 11:06:33 PDT
From: "Peter G. Neumann" <neumann@csl.sri.com>
Subject: America's *Frontlline Doctors*? (Gizmodo)

https://gizmodo.com/who-are-americas-frontline-doctors-the-pro-trump-pro-1844528900

  [This one is really amazing.  PGN]

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:25:17 -0400
From: Greg Searle <greg.searle1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: When tax prep is free, you may be paying with your privacy
  (RISKS-32.11)

The IRS guarantees that you can file your taxes for free if you are under a
certain income level. You can do it directly through the IRS or through
another service. These services will really attempt to "recommend" a product
that is more "suitable" for you (that they charge a fee for), but they can't
charge you at all for the free option.

https://www.irs.gov/filing/free-file-do-your-federal-taxes-for-free

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:33:00 -0500
From: Bob Wilson <wilson@math.wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: Long-Lost Computation Dissertation of Unix Pioneer Dennis Ritchie
  (RISKS-32.15?)

When I submitted my dissertation (1969), we were required not just to submit
a hard copy to the university (UW-Madison) but also to sign a form giving
permission for it to be copied and recorded at a national repository: I
think that was maintained at the University of Michigan.  We had to give
them permission to use it, under our copyright prerogatives.

Quite a few people did not like being required to "give away" some of their
copyright ownership. (It did not make too much difference for folks like me,
in mathematics, but in many of the humanities subjects people at least hoped
to turn their theses into books they could sell, where copyright ownership
could really matter.) We were told that the requirement to sign that form
was essentially universal in U.S. graduate education, mandatory before your
degree would be granted. So I am surprised it was not required at Harvard!

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:42:10 -0700
From: Henry Baker <hbaker1@pipeline.com>
Subject: Re: Darwin's tautology? (Ward, RISKS-32.15)

The evolution(!) of terminology which converts meaningful statements into
tautologies happens all the time in math and science, and is almost always a
'good thing'(tm), as it signifies 'progress'.

The terms 'survival' and 'fit, fitter, fittest' preceded Darwin and
'evolution', so there was a bit of carving and sanding required to 'fit'
these terms into Darwin's evolutionary theory.  However, now that Darwin's
evolutionary theory has been mostly accepted, the terms 'survival' and 'fit,
fitter, fittest' are now (re)defined in terms of this evolutionary theory;
hence 'survival of the fittest' has now *become* a tautology.

Ditto in the world of mathematics.  Prior to Cardano, Fermat, Pascal and
Laplace, 'probability' was a very elusive term.  Modern probability theory
(due to Kolmogorov) has been so successful that the notion of 'probability'
is now identical to the mathematical definition, so many previously
meaningful statements about probability have been converted into
tautologies.

Ditto in the engineering world.  Prior to Claude Shannon, an 'error' in
communications was an imprecise term; however, post-Shannon, it's almost
impossible to discuss non-Shannon-like 'errors', e.g., errors that correlate
widely separated bits/characters, because the definition of the terms have
changed to make Shannon-like errors the easiest to discuss.

All this is progress, because it converts PhD theses into undergraduate
exercises; thence to high school exercises; and finally into definitions.
We now 'see' the world using terminology and definitions that make
previously difficult concepts blindingly obvious.  Only those in the
transition period old enough to remember the previous confusion will fully
appreciate the clarity produced by these new ways of perceiving.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:39:47 -0500
From: Bob Wilson <wilson@math.wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: Darwin's tautology? (Ward, RISKS-32.15)

The comment that
  > "The conclusion is implicit in the premises": but this is just a
  > property of every valid mathematical argument.
correctly tells us that any mathematical proof amounts to discarding
information, or at best copying it over! I have always loved that.  (It does
not say that proofs are useless: Presumably they lay clear(er) why something
might have been obvious!)

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:00:12 +0100
From: Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Darwin's tautology? (Baker, RISKS-32.15?)

> The evolution(!) of terminology which converts meaningful statements into
> tautologies happens all the time in math and science, and is almost always
> a 'good thing'(tm), as it signifies 'progress'.

This is true, as long as you are not implying that the meaningful statement
becomes *less* meaningful when it is "converted" into a tautology.

Fermat's Last Theorem was always a meaningful statement, and since Andrew
Wile proved it we now know it is a tautology: but still just as meaningful.
The statement "God exists" is (with a suitably precise definition of "God")
a meaningful statement, and Plantinga's Ontological Argument uses Model
Logic to prove that it is a tautology: it is true in all possible worlds.
But it is still just as meaningful, if not even more so!

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 17:10:38 -0600
From: "Matthew Kruk" <mkrukg@gmail.com>
Subject: CFIA investigating mysterious shipments of seeds landing in mailboxes
  (CBC)

U.S. residents are not the only ones:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/warning-about-unauthorized-seeds-in-mail-1.5667883

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 11:11:11 -0800
From: RISKS-request@csl.sri.com
Subject: Abridged info on RISKS (comp.risks)

 The ACM RISKS Forum is a MODERATED digest.  Its Usenet manifestation is
 comp.risks, the feed for which is donated by panix.com as of June 2011.
=> SUBSCRIPTIONS: The mailman Web interface can be used directly to
 subscribe and unsubscribe:
   http://mls.csl.sri.com/mailman/listinfo/risks

=> SUBMISSIONS: to risks@CSL.sri.com with meaningful SUBJECT: line that
   includes the string `notsp'.  Otherwise your message may not be read.
 *** This attention-string has never changed, but might if spammers use it.
=> SPAM challenge-responses will not be honored.  Instead, use an alternative
 address from which you never send mail where the address becomes public!
=> The complete INFO file (submissions, default disclaimers, archive sites,
 copyright policy, etc.) is online.
   <http://www.CSL.sri.com/risksinfo.html>
 *** Contributors are assumed to have read the full info file for guidelines!

=> OFFICIAL ARCHIVES:  http://www.risks.org takes you to Lindsay Marshall's
    searchable html archive at newcastle:
  http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/VL.IS --> VoLume, ISsue.
  Also,  ftp://ftp.sri.com/risks for the current volume
     or ftp://ftp.sri.com/VL/risks-VL.IS for previous VoLume
  If none of those work for you, the most recent issue is always at
     http://www.csl.sri.com/users/risko/risks.txt, and index at /risks-32.00
  ALTERNATIVE ARCHIVES: http://seclists.org/risks/ (only since mid-2001)
 *** NOTE: If a cited URL fails, we do not try to update them.  Try
  browsing on the keywords in the subject line or cited article leads.
  Apologies for what Office365 and SafeLinks may have done to URLs.
==> Special Offer to Join ACM for readers of the ACM RISKS Forum:
    <http://www.acm.org/joinacm1>

------------------------------

End of RISKS-FORUM Digest 32.16
************************

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post