[7199] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: m12-182-16 & m66-080-13

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathan Reed)
Fri Dec 17 10:07:09 2010

Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Jonathan Reed <jdreed@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <E3560CFE983F2C4C82277F69E11BCF3A021A623CE9@EXPO8.exchange.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:07:00 -0500
Cc: Jonathon Weiss <jweiss@mit.edu>,
   "release-team@MIT.EDU" <release-team@mit.edu>, John T Guy <jtguy@mit.edu>,
   Joyce Gomes <jogomes@mit.edu>
Message-Id: <0C73FD33-75B6-47D5-AB92-B20397892503@mit.edu>
To: Thomas Smith <tjsmith@mit.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

12-182-16 has been successfully re-installed at 64-bit, by downloading the initrd and kernel by hand and kexec'ing them.  I'll check on 56-129-23 later today and do a bit more testing, to see if /proc/cpuinfo is failing to report the "lm" flag, or if something different is going on.

-Jon

On Dec 16, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Thomas Smith wrote:

> Hi Jon,
> 
> Yes, we are replacing the GX620 and the equipment for such are arriving this week.
> 
> Thanks for looking into the 12-182-16 machine.
> 
> Best,
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Reed [mailto:jdreed@MIT.EDU] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:29 PM
> To: Thomas Smith
> Cc: Jonathon Weiss; release-team@MIT.EDU; John T Guy; Joyce Gomes
> Subject: Re: m12-182-16 & m66-080-13
> 
> 66-080-13 is a GX620, and we're going to start replacing those soon, right?   Is it soon enough that we should just go ahead and replace it?
> 
> 12-182-16 is very strange, I'll go poke at it now.
> 
> jdreed@INFINITE-LOOP:~$ athinfo m12-182-16 uname Linux m12-182-16 2.6.32-26-generic-pae #48-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 24 10:31:20 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux jdreed@INFINITE-LOOP:~$ athinfo m12-182-16 memory user=3990056, phys=3990056 (3896 M) jdreed@INFINITE-LOOP:~$ 
> 
> It's running a PAE kernel, which is possibly reasonable given that it has 4GB of memory, except that 755s should not have 4GB of memory to begin with.
> 
> 
> -Jon
> 
> 
> On Dec 16, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Thomas Smith wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> Any  suggestions?
>> 
>> Thomas
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: jweiss@MIT.EDU [mailto:jweiss@MIT.EDU]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:06 PM
>> To: Thomas Smith
>> Cc: release-team@MIT.EDU; John T Guy; Joyce Gomes; Jonathon Weiss
>> Subject: Re: m12-182-16 & m66-080-13
>> 
>> 
>> Release-team,
>> 
>> Both of these machineas appear to have successfully been re-installed, but are still running 32-bit lucid.  They need additional investigation.
>> 
>> 	Jonathon
> 



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post