[6947] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Release Team Agenda, Friday 9/10

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathon Weiss)
Tue Sep 7 19:56:05 2010

Message-Id: <201009072355.o87NtqZe024675@wax-lion.mit.edu>
From: Jonathon Weiss <jweiss@MIT.EDU>
To: Alex T Prengel <alexp@MIT.EDU>
cc: Jonathan Reed <jdreed@MIT.EDU>,
   "release-team@mit.edu" <release-team@MIT.EDU>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:02:58 EDT."
             <1283882580.27101.20.camel@dit> 
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:55:51 -0400

> On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 13:42 -0400, Jonathan Reed wrote:
> > Here's what I have on the agenda.  If you want to add something, please reply-all:
> 
> Can we have a 32 bit dialup for things that don't work on 64? (ProE at
> the moment, though other situations are likely to come up).

I won't be able to be at the meeting this week, because it is on Rosh
HaShanna.  

That said I have some concerns about this.  The two things that come
to mind are: 1) that the dialups are generally not supposed to be for
computationally intensive work, and I'm a little worried about
pointing all ProE users at them (especially if there's only one) and
2) This would result in us having to maintain two different dialup
configurations long term, which while it doesn't quite double the
amount of work required, it comes really close.  We can probably
arrange something short term (it's not like I've had time to upgrade
the dialups to lucid yet anyway), but what sort of timeframe were you
expecting to need this for?

	Jonathon

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post