[6461] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Login chroots

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geoffrey Thomas)
Fri Oct 9 15:14:15 2009

Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 15:14:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@MIT.EDU>
To: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
cc: ghudson@mit.edu, release-team@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0910091451120.8245@dr-wily.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0910091511550.13456@dr-wily.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.00

On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Anders Kaseorg wrote:

> Running updates inside a temporary snapshot could do all sorts of bad
> things like restart daemons inside the snapshot.

Isn't this what policy-rc.d is for?

> [snip]
> However, I think this is too much work to think about right now, and we
> should move ahead with aufs without concurrent updates as soon as
> possible.

Agreed. At the release-team meeting we've concluded that it's fine not to 
have concurrent updates and we don't currently want them for n reasons; I 
just want to point out that if we ever revisit that decision, we're not 
losing functionality by switching to aufs.

-- 
Geoffrey Thomas
geofft@mit.edu

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post