[6100] in Release_7.7_team
Re: Reworking liblocker
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Wed Dec 3 16:04:30 2008
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
To: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@mit.edu>
Cc: release-team@mit.edu, athena10@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <BBF43488-C5EB-4689-B6F3-C4B2AF2B5E96@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:03:44 -0500
Message-Id: <1228338224.20381.9.camel@ray>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.00
On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 15:37 -0500, Ken Raeburn wrote:
> So unless
> someone's working on updating us to krb5 zephyr, zephyr's got a
> limited lifespan and we should be finding other ways to get
> notifications out if, indeed, we need to do that at all. As for
> specific plans in phasing out krb4 or doing anything about Zephyr,
> I'll just say that I'm not really in much of a position to have heard
> about MIT's plans, so the fact that I've heard next to nothing
> recently may mean little.
krb5 zephyr code exists (thanks for Karl). ops is backlogged and has no
specific timeline for deploying it on the servers, but I suspect that
will be a path of lesser resistance than desupporting Zephyr entirely.
