[4928] in Release_7.7_team
Re: 2004 Athena Cluster Usage draft is complete.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathon Weiss)
Mon Feb 14 18:08:31 2005
Message-Id: <200502142308.j1EN8Gxu017646@the-other-woman.mit.edu>
From: Jonathon Weiss <jweiss@MIT.EDU>
To: Bill Cattey <wdc@MIT.EDU>
cc: release-team@MIT.EDU, hallisey@MIT.EDU, pbh@MIT.EDU
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:07:09 EST."
<1108415229.26804.9.camel@tokata.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:08:16 -0500
> Before we announce to leaders like Theresa, Vijay and Phil, would people
> please take a look at:
>
> http://web.mit.edu/release/www/2004-cluster-usage/
>
> and sanity check my prose, and the presentation.
>
> I'm VERY pleased with how Andrew's new graphs came out this year.
> Phil Long's suggestion that we try and graph usage through the day
> turned into a redo of the presentation that is simultaneously simpler,
> richer, and easier to understand.
>
> I'd like to give this URL at least to Phil Long ASAP! Preferably in a
> day or two.
Please re-write the second paragraph of the executive summary. In
particular, I don't understand what you're trying to say in the second
sentence.
Please insert the word "percentage" in one to three places in the
third paragraph of the executive summary, and perhaps liberally
throughout the rest of the document.
Is there a reason you used spring terms, rather than fall terms, which
would have allowed you to used data from the term that just ended?
It's interesting to note that w20-575 percentage usage is down despite
the loss of 15 (greater than 10%) of its traditional seats. Or am I
confused about when that happened?
the 37-318 multi-year average graph does not appear. (there's even a
note about it, now that I look carefully). I fail to see why 37-332
and 37-318 should be considered seperately, rather than as the single
cluster they really are.
Jonathon
