[4032] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Plan for moving tetex to a locker

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Mon Sep 22 19:05:58 2003

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
To: "andrew m. boardman" <amb@mit.edu>
Cc: release-team@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200309222100.h8ML0GAS001666@pothole.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1064271949.2979.0.camel@error-messages.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:05:50 -0400

On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 17:00, andrew m. boardman wrote:
> >I have prepared a tetex-2.0.4 locker as a proof of concept.
> 
> You meant tetex-2.0.2 here?

Uh, yeah.

> >We will do the native RPM thing on Linux.
> 
> Redhat remains stuck on tetex 1.0.7, unless you want to get the rawhide
> packages.  That seems prone to cause trouble, though lightweight TeX
> users might not notice or care.

Well, if 2.0.x is in rawhide, then presumably it will show up in a
future Red Hat release which we will use for 9.3, so this problem will
solve itself.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post