[3792] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Solaris GNOME/X issue

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Thu Apr 3 01:04:03 2003

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
To: Garry Zacheiss <zacheiss@mit.edu>
Cc: release-team@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200304030156.UAA07026@riff-raff.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 03 Apr 2003 01:03:59 -0500
Message-Id: <1049349839.1688.30.camel@lockpicking-tools.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0

On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 20:56, Garry Zacheiss wrote:
> >> I can only hope that performance is acceptable without the Render
> >> extension on m64 machines (which include the Ultra 5s and Sunblade 100s;
> >> Sunblade 150s have ifb framebuffers which appear to support 32-bit
> >> pixmaps).

As Garry pointed out, I was wrong about the video card in use on the
Sunblade 100, but it doesn't matter; none of our machines appear to
support 32-bit pixmaps.  So we have to wait for Sun to come up with a
usable Render extension before any machines will be able to take
advantage of it.

>    A more likely looking patch is 113098-04, which replaces
> libXrender.so and claims to fix this bug:
> 
> 4770510 RENDER should not be advertised unless required depths are supported

I've verified that the server properly doesn't advertise the Render
extension on my Sunblade 100 with this patch.  (The relevant file is
/usr/openwin/server/modules/SUNWRender.so.1.)  miki, please put those
three patches into the os and install volumes when you get a chance.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post