[3606] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Sanity check: Removing Sparc 5 from W92 Test Cluster

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phillip Long)
Tue Dec 3 17:56:27 2002

Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 17:57:03 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-54-519481681
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548)
Cc: release-team@mit.edu, owls@mit.edu
To: Bill Cattey <wdc@mit.edu>
From: Phillip Long <longpd@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <1038954055.7047.46.camel@tokata.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <8A1243D6-0712-11D7-85CF-000393B2A804@mit.edu>


--Apple-Mail-54-519481681
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=US-ASCII;
	format=flowed

Bill: go for it.

phil

On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 05:20 PM, Bill Cattey wrote:

> I have a SunBlade 150 to put into the W92 Test Cluster.
> I was thinking of installing it in place of Pitfall, the Sparc 5.
>
> Sparc 5's have been listed as "Dead" in the Athena LifeCycle Summary
> page as of June 2002.  (Athena 9.1 is Ultra-only.)
>
> We have not had requests for debugging on the Sparc 5 platform, so I
> propose to remove the Sparc 5 hardware, install the Sunblade 150, and
> call the new hardware with the old name Pitfall.
>
> Does this sound sane?
>
> -wdc
>
>
Phillip D. Long, Ph.D.					              -- longpd@mit.edu
Senior Strategist for the Academic Computing Enterprise
MIT - N42-005		  					        -- voice:617-452-4038
77 Massachusetts Avene (street 211 Mass. Ave.)       --  fax: 
617-253-8665
Cambridge, MA 02139

--Apple-Mail-54-519481681
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=US-ASCII

Bill: go for it.


phil


On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 05:20 PM, Bill Cattey wrote:


<excerpt>I have a SunBlade 150 to put into the W92 Test Cluster.

I was thinking of installing it in place of Pitfall, the Sparc 5.


Sparc 5's have been listed as "Dead" in the Athena LifeCycle Summary

page as of June 2002.  (Athena 9.1 is Ultra-only.)


We have not had requests for debugging on the Sparc 5 platform, so I

propose to remove the Sparc 5 hardware, install the Sunblade 150, and

call the new hardware with the old name Pitfall.


Does this sound sane?


-wdc



</excerpt><fontfamily><param>Helvetica</param>Phillip D. Long,
Ph.D.					              -- longpd@mit.edu

Senior Strategist for the Academic Computing Enterprise

MIT - N42-005		  					        -- voice:617-452-4038

77 Massachusetts Avene (street 211 Mass. Ave.)       --  fax:
617-253-8665

Cambridge, MA 02139</fontfamily>


--Apple-Mail-54-519481681--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post