[3189] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

black Dell cluster machine net still poor?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Erik Wile)
Tue Mar 26 15:32:38 2002

Message-Id: <200203262032.PAA10488@esw.mit.edu>
To: release-team@MIT.EDU
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:32:35 -0500
From: Erik Wile <esw@MIT.EDU>


Some cluster machines have had piss poor network performance, on the
order of 50kB/s at 3am on a friday night...  (Don't ask how I know
this. :) while adjacent machines get 800kB/s to the same host shortly
thereafter.  I noticed a line about this in the 9.0.25 patch release,
excerpted here:

  * On Linux, a workaround is in place for the 3C509 autonegotiation
    problem causing poor network performance for some black Dell
    machines.

I just checked one of the poorly performing machines [m1-142-16] which
took the update last night:
Athena Workstation (linux) Version Update Mon Mar 25 23:52:30 EST 2002
Athena Workstation (linux) Version 9.0.25 Tue Mar 26 00:54:15 EST 2002

And it's still performing poorly.  Granted my quick test was mid day,
with presumably a fair amount of competing traffic, but it was still
suspiciously pegged at 50kB/s.  Does anyone know what the root cause
of this is, what the workaround was and why it might not have took?
Grepping for eth0 in /var/log/messages didn't show anything telltale
when I did it on friday night... I failed to check this afternoon and
I'm far from the cluster now.  I noticed that "athinfo m1-142-16
interfaces" shows 0.1% RX-ERRs for eth0, and similar low percentages
for other known bad machines, while it shows 0 errors for known good
machines such as m1-142-9 and m1-142-12.  That's interesting.  Hmmm,
now that I think about it I might have just grepped eth0 in dmesg, not
/var/log.  Oops.

Am I imagining things here?  [was the performance during my quick test
this afternoon just a strange coincidence?]  Is there anything I can
do in the meantime -- a meta-workaround?

-erik

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post