[3109] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Athena 9.0.24 for Linux tonight

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thomas E Cavin)
Fri Jan 25 16:46:37 2002

From: Thomas E Cavin <cavin@MIT.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15441.53815.722474.791888@lap1-wccf.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:46:31 -0500
To: Athena Software Release Team <release-team@mit.edu>
CC: Tom Cavin <cavin@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <15441.42643.201097.312939@lap1-wccf.mit.edu>


Hi,

I have a follow-up question on updates.  One of the users was logged in on
the console of his private Athena Linux system (with AUTOUPDATE=TRUE), and
had left an Emacs, Matlab, and a couple of SSH processes running.  His
Kerberos tickets would have expired by the time the update happened, but
the other processes would still have been active.

I thought the update_ws script would wait for the system to be idle with no
users before updating the system.  The user is concerned that this might
happen when he was running a long analysis job overnight.

Is there something in the idle status check code for the update process
that would let an update occur under these circumstances?  

Thanks,

	--Tom

 > Garry Zacheiss writes:
 > >> First question: was this update forced?  (I think someone was on one
 > >> of the systems when it updated.)
 > 
 >    No, there was nothing special about this patch release; machines
 > would have taken it or not as they always have.

-- 
Tom Cavin                                Phone:  (617) 258 - 7806
WCCF Computer Operations Manager         Email:  tec@ai.mit.edu

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post