[2936] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Rationale for X-server kill discrepancy?; also mwm vs. sawfish

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jacob Morzinski)
Sun Sep 9 17:33:36 2001

To: release-team@MIT.EDU
Cc: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Jacob Morzinski <jmorzins@MIT.EDU>
Date: 09 Sep 2001 17:33:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: John Hawkinson's message of "Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:34:27 -0400 (EDT)"
Message-ID: <w6mu1ycf3rr.fsf@opus.mit.edu>

<jhawk@MIT.EDU> (John Hawkinson) writes:
> Principal request: Can we enable the X server kill functionality on
> Athena linux machines?  It would restore parity with the IRIX machines
> and make it easier to deal with this case a bit faster.



There was some discussion on this in bugs, in Spring 2000.
(transactions: 17618 17668 17673 17677 17678 17679 17680  17788 17944)

My opinion on the matter [bugs:17677] was:
  I think Travis's point was not "do we want to have a keystroke
  that kills the X server?", but was instead "do we want to have the
  keystroke that kills the X server to be so easy to mistakenly hit?"
  The Irix machines have a "kill the X server" key combination
  that is near-impossible to accidentally type.  The Linux key
  combination is so easy to accidentally type that it should be
  disabled.

For everyone except jhawk, the problem-solving technique for Suns
is already "reboot if there's an X problem".  I don't mind the
Intel machines having the same solution.  (It would be nice to be
able to make use of the alternate VT's, but I understand why
they're turned off right now.)

 -Jacob

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post