home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <v04220802b6cc10818ad3@[18.18.0.128]> In-Reply-To: <200103070813.DAA03442@riff-raff.mit.edu> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 11:35:40 -0500 To: Garry Zacheiss <zacheiss@mit.edu>, "Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis@mit.edu> From: Ted McCabe <ted@MIT.EDU> Cc: Garry Zacheiss <zacheiss@mit.edu>, "Susan S. Minai-Azary" <azary@mit.edu>, Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>, John Hawkinson <jhawk@mit.edu>, release-team@mit.edu, op@mit.edu, winzephyr-release@mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" My apologies for continuing the disussion on this topic, but it strikes that during all of this discussion that there is a fundamental question that is explicitly unanswered. Who do we consider to be a customer? It seems to me that we don't all have the same idea what the answer is. I have the impression that ASO and ghudson addressed this zephyr problem from the point of view that a customer is basically someone who uses IS supported software, while Jeff and Susan et. al. seem to have been working with the idea that a customer is basically someone who uses IS' servers. I expect I haven't quite captured the exact notion that people consider the answer to be. I just want to point out that our differences in this regard seem a likely cause as to our different respective reactions to the situation. The result being that some of us initially considered customers to be affected and others didn't. --Ted
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |